Nuclear Power

New England Expansion

Home
Nuclear Power Usage Worldwide
Uranium Reserves and Usage
Light Water Reactors
Pebble Bed Reactors
Nuclear Power - Pros and Cons
New England Expansion

6. Make a case for expanding our use of nuclear power to generate electricity in New England.

There are currently 5 nuclear energy plants in New England:
Millstone 2-878 MW                  Waterford, CT
Millstone 3-1148 MW                Waterford, CT
Pilgrim-685 MW                         Plymouth, MA
Vermont Yankee-510 MW         Vernon, VT
Seabrook-1155 MW                  Seabrook, NH
 
New England is a region with some of the highest electricity rates in the nation. Thus, generating electricity economically is crucial. As electricity demand in New England is expected to increase at a rate of one new power plant a year, the region’s nuclear generation is essential to maintain a balance between supply and demand. Currently, none are under construction. Nuclear energy plants in New England are also increasing efficiency due to better management practices.
New England should increase its use in nuclear energy because nuclear energy:
 
1. Is an essential and reliable source of electricity that maintains grid stability. The second largest source of supply, New England’s nuclear energy plants generate more than a quarter of the region’s electricity. Nuclear units typically operate for more than 500 days before refueling.

2. Generate electricity at the lowest cost. Nuclear energy plants have the lowest
production costs of any major source of electricity (less than a third of the cost of natural gas-fired generation).
As of 2004, U.S. average electricity production costs are 1.7 cents/kwh for nuclear, 1.9 cents/kwh for coal, 5.4 cents/kwh for oil, and 5.9 cents/kwh for natural gas.

3. Produce no air emissions. In generating electricity, nuclear energy plants produce no nitrogen oxide or sulfur dioxide that cause smog and acid rain. They also produce no carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, or particulate matter which has been linked to public health effects. Thus, it is easier to attain greenhouse gas reduction goals for those states with in-state programs as well as those participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
 
On a side note, uranium reserves are more accessible and common than crude oil reserves for the U.S. Thus, using more nuclear energy will lessen our dependence on foreign oil.

Enter supporting content here